ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC34 N256
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC34
Information
Technology --
Document Description and Processing Languages
|
TITLE: |
Summary of Voting on SC 34 N 221 - Topic Map Constraint
Language to support ISO/IEC 13250 |
|
SOURCE: |
SC 34 Secretariat |
|
PROJECT: |
|
|
PROJECT EDITOR: |
SC 34 / WG 3 |
|
STATUS: |
|
|
ACTION: |
Based on the voting results, this project is approved. This
document is forwarded to WG 3, which is instructed to begin development of
this new work item. The JTC 1 NP
number for this project is ISO/IEC 19756 |
|
DATE: |
|
|
DISTRIBUTION: |
SC34 and Liaisons |
|
REFER TO: |
|
|
REPLY TO: |
Dr. James David Mason |
JTC 1 / SC 34 N 0256
2001-10-04
JTC 1 / SC 34 Voting Summary
N 221 -
Proposed NP for Topic Map Constraint
Language
|
Q.1 |
Do you accept the proposal in document JTC 1 N 183 as a sufficient definition of the new work item? (If you have responded "NO" to the above question, you are required to comment.) 9 of 13 – Yes , 0 of 13
– No , 0 of 13 – Abstain , 4 of 13 – No Response |
|
Q.2 |
Do you support the addition of the new work item to the programme of work of the joint technical committee? 8 of 13 – Yes , 0 of 13
– No , 0 of 13 Abstain , 5 of 13 – No Response |
|
Q.3 |
Do you commit yourself to participate in the development of this new work item? 5 of 13 – Yes , 3 of 13
– No , 0 of 13 Abstain , 5 of 13 – No Response |
|
Q.4 |
Are you able to offer a project editor who will dedicate his/her efforts to the advancement and maintenance of this project? (If "YES," please identify .............................................................) 1 of 13 – Yes , 7 of 13
– No , 0 of 13 Abstain , 5 of 13 – No Response |
|
Q.5 |
Do you have a major contribution or a reference document ready for submittal? 1 of 13 – Yes , 7 of 13
– No , 0 of 13 Abstain , 5 of 13 – No Response |
|
Q.6 |
Will you have such a contribution in ninety days? 1 of 13 – Yes , 7 of 13
– No , 0 of 13 Abstain , 5 of 13 – No Response |
|
P-Member |
Q.1 |
Q.2 |
Q.3 |
Q.4 |
Q.5 |
Q.6 |
Comments |
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
|
|
Denmark |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
|
|
France |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ireland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italy |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
|
|
Japan |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
|
|
Republic of Korea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netherlands |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
|
|
Norway |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
|
United Kingdom |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
|
|
United States |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
|
NP Approval Criteria per the JTC 1
Directives
9.3.2
In order to be approved, the NP shall be supported by
a majority of all P‑members of JTC 1* with at least five P‑members of the SC to which the project
will be assigned committed to active participation.
*Per JTC 1 N 6148, the 60 Day Letter Ballot Concerning Subcommittee Level Approval of NPs was approved
Based on the results of this letter ballot, this NP is APPROVED, and will
be added to the SC 34 Program of Work
National Body Comments Received
United Kingdom
The UK has some comments to make on the NW Proposal and the Project
Acceptance Criteria.
The question about requirements for coding has been answered NO. There
is a requirement for the language to be expressed in XML which may be
significant in terms of document presentation and the answer to this question
should be re-examined.
The Technical Status of the proposed project is unclear with both Mature
and Prospective Technology questions being answered YES. The UK considers that
SC 34 should have a clearer understanding of the status of the technology being
standardized.
The status of conformance to the proposed standard is unclear. Question
D1 indicates that there will be no Conformity Assessment but clause 4 of N226
is entitled Notes on Conformance. The UK considers that this needs
clarification.