Title: | New Work Item Proposal for Restatement of Topic Maps, ISO/IEC 13250:2002 |
Source: | JTC1/SC34/WG3 |
Project: | ISO/IEC 13250:2002 |
Project editor: | M. Biezunski, M. Bryan, S. Newcomb |
Status: | NP |
Action: | Processing by JTC1/SC 34 |
Date: | 20 December 2002 |
Due Date: | 20 March 2003 |
Distribution: | SC34 and Liaisons |
Refer to: | |
Supercedes: | |
Reply to: | Dr. James David Mason (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 Chairman) Y-12 National Security Complex Information Technology Services Bldg. 9113 M.S. 8208 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8208 U.S.A. Telephone: +1 865 574-6973 Facsimile: +1 865 574-1896 E-mailk: mailto:[email protected] http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/sc34oldhome.htm Mrs. Sara Desautels, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Secretariat American National Standards Institute 25 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 Tel: +1 212 642-4937 Fax: +1 212 840-2298 E-mail: [email protected] |
Date of presentation of
proposal: 2002-12-20 |
Proposer: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 |
Secretariat: ANSI |
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 358 |
A proposal for a new work item shall be submitted to the secretariat of the ISO/IEC joint technical committee concerned with a copy to the ISO Central Secretariat.
Presentation of the proposal - to be completed by the
proposer Guidelines for proposing and justifying a new work item are given in
ISO Guide 26.
Title (subject to be covered and type of standard, e.g. terminology, method of test, performance requirements, etc.)
Topic Maps (ISO/IEC 13250)
|
Scope (and field of
application)
Topic maps enable multiple, concurrent views of sets of information objects. The structural nature of these views is unconstrained; they may reflect an object oriented approach, or they may be relational, hierarchical, ordered, unordered, or any combination of the foregoing. Moreover, an unlimited number of topic maps may be overlaid on a given set of information resources. (From ISO/IEC 13250) |
Purpose and justification -
attach a separate page as annex, if necessary
This is a restatement of the standard to allow the following:
The resulting standard is expected to contain the following:
|
Programme of work
If the proposed new work item is approved , which of the following
document(s) is (are) expected to be developed?
|
Relevant documents to be considered
Guide to the topic map standards (SC34 N323), ISO/IEC 13250, Topic Maps (SC34 N322), The XML Topic Maps (XTM) Syntax 1.0 (SC34 N328), Reference Model for ISO/IEC 13250 Topic Maps (SC34 N344), The Standard Application Model for Topic Maps (SC34 N356) |
Cooperation and liaison
ISUG, OASIS |
Preparatory work offered with
target date(s)
|
Signature:
Sara Desautels, ANSI |
Will the service of a maintenance
agency or registration authority be required? No - If yes, have you identified a potential candidate? ................ - If yes, indicate name ............................................................. Are there any known requirements for coding? No Are there any known requirements for cultural and
linguistic adaptability? No Does the proposed standard concern known patented
items? No |
Comments and recommendations of the JTC 1 Secretariat
- attach a separate page as an annex, if necessary
Comments with respect to the
proposal in general, and recommendations thereon:
|
Voting on the proposal - Each P-member of the
ISO/IEC joint technical committee has an obligation to vote within the time
limits laid down (normally three months after the date of circulation).
Date of circulation: 2002-12-20 |
Closing date for voting: 2003-03-20 |
Signature of JTC 1/SC 34 Secretary: Sara Desautels, ANSI |
NEW WORK ITEM PROPOSAL - PROJECT ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA | ||
Criterion | Validity | Explanation |
A Business Requirement | ||
A.1 Market Requirement | Essential _X_ Desirable ___ Supportive ___ |
Without a formal data model (currently termed the Standard Application Model) it is not possible to guarantee interoperability between implementations or define a standard mechanisms for expressing queries and constraints on topic maps. (Note: A Topic Map Query Language and a Topic Map Constraint Language are already approved work items with the ISO/IEC numbers 18048 and 19756 respectively. Work on these cannot be completed without the formal data model.) |
A.2 Regulatory Context | Essential ___ Desirable ___ Supportive ___ Not Relevant _X_ |
|
B. Related Work | ||
B.1 Completion/Maintenance of current standards | Yes _X_ No___ |
The NP takes the form of maintenance of an existing standard, ISO/IEC 13250. |
B.2 Commitment to other organization | Yes ___ No _X_ |
|
B.3 Other Source of standards | Yes ___ No _X_ |
|
C. Technical Status | ||
C.1 Mature Technology | Yes _X_ No ___ |
A number of commercial and open source implementations of ISO/IEC 13250 now exist and serve to demonstrate the maturity of the technology. |
C.2 Prospective Technology | Yes ___ No_X_ |
This NP is not anticipatory. It is motived by a proven need (not least by the above-mentioned implementations) for the proposed extensions and clarifications. |
C.3 Models/Tools | Yes ___ No _X_ |
|
D. Conformity Assessment and Interoperability | ||
D.1 Conformity Assessment | Yes ___ No _X_ |
|
D.2 Interoperability | Yes _X_ No ___ |
SGML (ISO 8879), HyTime (ISO/IEC 10744), XML (W3C Recommendation) |
E. Other Justification |
Notes to Proforma
A. Business Relevance. That which identifies market place relevance in terms of what problem is being solved and or need being addressed.
A.1. Market Requirement. When submitting a NP, the proposer shall identify the nature of the Market Requirement, assessing the extent to which it is essential, desirable or merely supportive of some other project.
A.2 Technical Regulation. If a Regulatory requirement is deemed to exist - e.g. for an area of public concern e.g. Information Security, Data protection, potentially leading to regulatory/public interest action based on the use of this voluntary international standard - the proposer shall identify this here.
B. Related Work. Aspects of the relationship of this NP to other areas of standardization work shall be identified in this section.
B.1 Competition/Maintenance. If this NP is concerned with completing or maintaining existing standards, those concerned shall be identified here.
B.2 External Commitment. Groups, bodies, or fora external to JTC1 to which a commitment has been made by JTC for cooperation and or collaboration on this NP shall be identified here.
B.3 External Std/Specification. If other activities creating standards or specifications in this topic area are known to exist or be planned, and which might be available to JTC1 as PAS, they shall be identified here.
C. Technical Status. The proposer shall indicate here an assessment of the extent to which the proposed standard is supported by current technology.
C.1 Mature Technology. Indicate here the extent to which the technology is reasonably stable and ripe for standardization.
C.2 Prospective Technology. If the NP is anticipatory in nature based on expected or forecasted need, this shall be indicated here.
C.3 Models/Tools. If the NP relates to the creation of supportive reference models or tools, this shall be indicated here.
D. Any other aspects of background information justifying this NP shall be indicated here.
D. Conformity Assessment and Interoperability
D.1 Indicate here if Conformity Assessment is relevant to your project. If so, indicate how it is addressed in your project plan.
D.2 Indicate here if Interoperability is relevant to your project. If so, indicate how it is addressed in your project plan.
VOTE ON A PROPOSED NEW WORK ITEM
ISO/IEC JTC 1 /SC 34 N 358
Date of Circulation of NP: 2002-12-20
Date of Ballot Close: 2003-03-20
Please return all votes and comments directly to the JTC 1/SC 34
Secretariat by the due date indicated.
Proposal for a new work item on
Title
Any proposal to add a new item to the programme of work shall be voted on
by correspondence, even if it has appeared in the agenda of a meeting.
A. Vote |
|
YES |
NO |
Comments |
Q.1 |
Do you accept the proposal in document JTC 1/SC
34 N 358 as a sufficient definition of the new work item? (If you have
responded "NO" to the above question, you are required to
comment.) |
____ |
____ |
____ |
Q.2 |
Do you support the addition of the new work item
to the programme of work of the joint technical committee? |
____ |
____ |
____ |
B. Participation |
|
|
|
|
Q.3 |
Do you commit yourself to participate in the
development of this new work item? |
____ |
____ |
____ |
Q.4 |
Are you able to offer a project editor who will
dedicate his/her efforts to the advancement and maintenance of this
project? (If "YES," please identify
.............................................................) |
____ |
____ |
____ |
C. Documentation |
|
|
|
|
Q.5 |
Do you have a major contribution or a reference
document ready for submittal? |
____ |
____ |
____ |
Q.6 |
Will you have such a contribution in ninety days? |
____ |
____ |
____ |
P-member Voting: National Body ______________________ |
Date: ______________ |
Submitted by: Name ____________________________ |