ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34N0744

ISO/IEC logo

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34

Information Technology --
Document Description and Processing Languages

TITLE: Disposition of Comments to N0726 Summary of Voting - Document Schema Definition Language (DSDL) - Part 1: Overview
SOURCE: Mr. Martin Bryan
PROJECT: FCD 19757-1: Information technology - Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) - Part 1: Overview
PROJECT EDITOR: Mr. Martin Bryan
STATUS: Disposition of comments
ACTION: The editor is directed to make the changes
DATE: 2006-05-30
DISTRIBUTION: SC34 and Liaisons
REFER TO: N0726 - 2006-04-16 - Summary of Voting on JTC 1/SC 34 N 693 - Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) Part 1 - Overview
N0693 - 2005-12-11 - Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) Part 1 - Overview
REPLY TO:

Dr. James David Mason
(ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Chairman)
Y-12 National Security Complex
Bldg. 9113, M.S. 8208
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8208 U.S.A.
Telephone: +1 865 574-6973
Facsimile: +1 865 574-1896
Network: [email protected]
http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/
ftp://ftp.y12.doe.gov/pub/sgml/sc34/

Mr. G. Ken Holman
(ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Secretariat - Standards Council of Canada)
Crane Softwrights Ltd.
Box 266,
Kars, ON K0A-2E0 CANADA
Telephone: +1 613 489-0999
Facsimile: +1 613 489-0995
Network: [email protected]
http://www.jtc1sc34.org

Canada

In Section 2, "Normative References", for UCS, if the year of publication is to be kept, the reference should be changed to point to the latest ISO publication date, which is 2003.

Accepted

"UCS, Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS), ISO/IEC 10646:2003"

Accepted

Japan

(1) Use "IRI", which allows non-ASCII characters, rather than "URI", which disallows them.

Accepted


(2) Reference RFC 3986 and RFC 3987 rather than RFC 2396.

Will reference RFC 3987, the IRI specification referred to in the first comment, which references RFC 3986.


(3) Reference to the third edition of XML 1.0.

Accepted


(4) Reference to the second edition of W3C XML Schema.

Accepted


(5) Reference to the second Edition of XML Information Set

Accepted

United Kingdom

UK approve with comment:

  1. The scope and foreword of the document should not duplicate information.

Accepted

  1. The document should be reviewed to ensure that it accurately reflects changes in the roles of the separate parts in light of recent developments.

Accepted