TITLE: | Status of Amd.1 to ISO/IEC 10179 |
SOURCE: | SC34/WG2 |
PROJECT: | |
PROJECT EDITOR: | |
STATUS: | |
ACTION: | For information |
DATE: | 2003-12-03 |
DISTRIBUTION: | SC34/WG2 and Liaisons |
REFER TO: | |
REPLY TO: |
Dr. Yushi Komachi, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG2 Convener
Telephone: +81 3 5434 7053 Facsimile: +81 3 5445 3663 Email: [email protected] SC34/WG2 Web: http://www.y-adagio.com/public/sc34wg2/index.htm Mr. G. Ken Holman, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 Secretariat Telephone: +1 613 489 0999 Facsimile: +1 613 489 0995 Email: [email protected] Dr. James David Mason, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 Chairman Telephone: +1 865 574 6973 Facsimile: +1 865 574 1896 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/ |
Amd.1 to ISO/IEC 10179 was published as shown in the ISO Web:
********************************************************************************************
ISO/IEC 10179:1996/Amd 1:2003 | ||||||||
|
********************************************************************************************
Before the publication, there were following editorial discussions:
******************************************************************************************* From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Extensions to DSSSL Date: 2003-06-30, 20:17 Yushi In looking at the text again for the preparation of the British comments I noticed a number of things that I had missed in the first draft, but as this vote is a simple Yes/No ballot I was not allowed to submit them as UK comments. You might, however, like to note the following: The tokens good-size and select-of-list in 12.6.28.5 and 12.6.28.7 are not ideal English. They would be more readable as optimum-size (or preferred-size) and select-from-list. In the last paragraph of 12.2.1 you have a "will" and a "may" that seem contradictary. Does DSSSL define a core interface for page composition? If it does not, the second sentence should be removed. In 12.6.28.5, in the description of frame-size, "used online display" should read "used for online display". In 12.6.28.7 should the token "words" for dialogue-return-type really be "word"? If not, what differentiates words from phrase? (Maybe you mean tokens and phrase, rather than word and phrase.) In 12.6.29.2 "class specify animation on online" should read "class is used to specify animation on a online". In B.1 it is inconsistent to say that the value is either #t and #f and then to say that any other value means true. In definition of pair in B.1 "with head part" should be "from a head part" The example of the use of quantity, (even? tapesize), is a poor one. In definition of quantity type you refer to a "base unit" but elsewhere in the same paragraph use the more logical term "dimension" for this. You should be consistent. Instead of "is used for a large size" you should use "allows a large size" In B.2 "SDQL to specify" should read "SDQL that is used to specify". The objects in B.3 and B.4 should be defined somewhere with at least single line definitions of the type shown in B.1 ******************************************************************************************* From: [email protected] To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re2: Proof for checking - FDIS 10179/Amd. 1 Date: 2003-07-07, 0:09 Dear Maho, Atlab and Keith In 2003-05-27, I confirmed the publication of ISO/IEC 10179/Amd.1 (if the FDIS ballot passes) with slight modifications indicated on "Requested Modifications on ISO/IEC 10179:1996/FDAM1" I attach "Additional Requested Modifications on ISO/IEC 10179:1996/FDAM1". If possible, could you include the additional modifications into the final text of ISO/IEC 10179/Amd.1? Thank you, *********************************************************************** Additional Requested Modifications on ISO/IEC 10179:1996/FDAM1 2003-07-07 Project Editor (1) page 1, 12.2.1, line 11 "DSSSL may define a core interface ..." ^^^ "may" should be "will". (2) page 2, 12.6.28.5, line 8 "one of the symbols maximum-size, good-size or minimum-size." ^^^^^^^^^ "good-size" should be "optimum-size". (3) page 2, 12.6.28.5, line 9 "... window to be used online display." ^ "used online" should be "used for an online". (4) page 2, 12.6.28.5, line 9 "The default value is good-size." ^^^^^^^^^ "good-size" should be "optimum-size". (5) page 3, 12.6.28.7, line 6 "..., select-objects, select-of-list or interaction." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "select-of-list" should be "select-from-list". (6) page 3, 12.6.28.7, line 8 "... OK-NO, OK, words or phrase." ^^^^^ "words" should be "tokens". (7) page 3, 12.6.29.2, line 1 "... object class specify animation on online display." ^ ^ "class specify" should be "class is used to specify". "on online" should be "on an online". (8) page 5, B.1, line 3 "The value is either #t ..." ^^^^^^^^^ "is either" should be "can be defined whether". (9) page 5, B.1, line 25 "A list is constructed with head ..." ^^^^ "with" should be "from a". (10) page 6, line 12 "An inexactness of the quality-type is used for a large ..." ^^^^^^^^^^^ "is used for" should be "allows". (11) page 6, B.2, line 2 "... type of SDQL to specify node ..." ^ "SDQL to" should be "SDQL that is used to". *********************************************************************** Requested Modifications on ISO/IEC 10179:1996/FDAM1 2003-05-27 Project Editor (1) page 5, B.1, line 13 "This type is used for specificaton of a DSSSL ...." ^^^^^^^^^^^^ "specificaton" should be "specification". ^ (2) page 7, B.3, line 14 "Transform-grove-spec specifies information of a grove tranformation." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "tranformation" should be "transformation". ^ (3) page 7, B.4, line 7 "generated-object: genarated object type" ^^^^^^^^^ "genarated" should be "generated". ^ (4) page 10, D.1, line 2 "A base abstruct(baseabs) module is ...." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "abstruct(baseabs)" should be "abstract (baseabs)". ^ ^ (5) page 11, D.2, line 1 "The propety set is an information ...." ^^^^^^^ "propety" should be "property". ^ (6) page 12, Table D.1 "dependo" Column n should be "dependon". ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ (7) page 13, 17, 24, 25, 30, 34, 41, 43, 46, 47 and 48, Table D.1(continued) "dependo" Column n should be "dependon". ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ (8) page 50, Table E.1, Table caption "Common characteritics of flow object classes" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "characteritics" should be "characteristics". ^ *********************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************* From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: Re2: Proof for checking - FDIS 10179/Amd. 1 Date: 2003-07-07, 21:35 >I attach "Additional Requested Modifications on ISO/IEC 10179:1996/FDAM1". >If possible, could you include the additional modifications into the final >text of ISO/IEC 10179/Amd.1? Dear Mr. Komachi, This is to confirm you that the additional modifications dated 2003-07-06 will be included into the above-mentioned final text. With kind regards, ******************************************************************************************* From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Final text - FDIS 10179/Amd. 1 Date: 2003-08-10, 20:49 Dear Mr. Takahashi SC34 Secretariat, Sara, informed me of the result of voting on ISO/IEC 10179 /FDAmd.1 in 2003-08-01. The result shows that FDAmd.1 was approved with 13 P-Members in favour out of 13(= 100%). However, CANADA noted an editorial change: row 0009 of table F.1 where the default value should be "... no space before ..."instead of "... no space after ...". Is it possible to include the Canadian comment into the final text? Besides, Sara requested me to circulate the final text within SC34. Could you send me the final text (in PDF and/or word forms)? Thank you. ******************************************************************************************* From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: Final text - FDIS 10179/Amd. 1 Date: 2003-08-11, 21:35 >However, CANADA noted an editorial change: >row 0009 of table F.1 where the default value should be "... no space before >..."instead of "... no space after ...". Dear Mr. Komachi, With regard to FDIS 10179/Amd. 1, please note that the requested correction has already done, and that this document is moving to the publication. Best regards, *******************************************************************************************