ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34N0652
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34
Information Technology --
Document Description and Processing Languages
| TITLE: | Summary of Voting on JTC 1/SC 34 N 598 - Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) - Part 3: Rule-based validation (Schematron) |
| SOURCE: | SC34 Secretariat |
| PROJECT: | FCD 19757-3: Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) Part 3 - Rule-based validation |
| PROJECT EDITOR: | Mr. Rick Jelliffe |
| STATUS: | Summary of voting |
| ACTION: | Based on the ballot responses, this FCD is APPROVED and the project status changes to 40.60. Project Editors are requested to review comments and advise the Secretariat regarding (1) the change to status 40.92, 40.93 or 40.99, and (2) the next project status and anticipated date that project status will change. |
| DATE: | 2005-06-27 |
| DISTRIBUTION: | SC34 and Liaisons |
| REFER TO: | N0598b - 2005-02-23 - Ballot due 2005-06-23 FCD Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) - Part 3: Rule-based validation
(Schematron) N0598 - 2005-02-23 - Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) - Part 3: Rule-based validation (Schematron) |
| REPLY TO: |
Dr. James David Mason (ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Secretariat - Standards Council of Canada) Crane Softwrights Ltd. Box 266, Kars, ON K0A-2E0 CANADA Telephone: +1 613 489-0999 Facsimile: +1 613 489-0995 Network: [email protected] http://www.jtc1sc34.org |
| P-Member | APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT AS PRESENTED | APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT WITH COMMENTS AS GIVEN ON THE ATTACHED | DISAPPROVAL OF THE DRAFT FOR REASONS ON THE ATTACHED | DISAPPROVAL (appropriate changes in the text will change vote to APPROVAL) | ABSTENTION (For Reasons Below) | NO RESPONSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | X | |||||
| China | X | |||||
| Italy | X | |||||
| Japan | X | |||||
| Korea | X | |||||
| Netherlands | X | |||||
| Norway | X | |||||
| United Kingdom | X | |||||
| United States | X |
Japan
1. Technical
In 6.3 "Schema Semantics", do we really need "if and only if"? Suppose that two sibling rules match a given context. This "if and only if" does not allow assertions in the second rule to hold.