ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34N0819
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34
Information Technology --
Document Description and Processing Languages
| TITLE: | Summary of Voting on JTC 1/SC 34 N 801 - Text for CD ballot for ISO/IEC 19757-9: Document Schema Definition Language (DSDL) Part 9 - Namespace- and datatype-aware DTDs |
| SOURCE: | SC34 Secretariat |
| PROJECT: | CD 19757-9: Information technology - Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) - Part 9: Datatype- and namespace-aware DTDs |
| PROJECT EDITOR: | Mr. Francis Cave |
| STATUS: | Summary of voting |
| ACTION: | Based on the ballot responses, this CD is APPROVED and the project status changes to 30.60. Project Editors are requested to review comments and advise the Secretariat regarding (1) the change to status 30.92 or 30.99, and (2) the next project status and anticipated date that project status will change. |
| DATE: | 2007-02-22 |
| DISTRIBUTION: | SC34 and Liaisons |
| REFER TO: | N0801b - 2006-11-21 - Ballot due 2007-02-21 CD 19757-9 N0801 - 2006-11-22 - Text for CD ballot for ISO/IEC 19757-9: Document Schema Definition Language (DSDL) Part 9 - Namespace- and datatype-aware DTDs |
| REPLY TO: |
Dr. James David Mason (ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Secretariat - Standards Council of Canada) Crane Softwrights Ltd. Box 266, Kars, ON K0A-2E0 CANADA Telephone: +1 613 489-0999 Facsimile: +1 613 489-0995 Network: [email protected] http://www.jtc1sc34.org |
| P-Member | APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT AS PRESENTED | APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT WITH COMMENTS AS GIVEN ON THE ATTACHED | DISAPPROVAL OF THE DRAFT FOR REASONS ON THE ATTACHED | DISAPPROVAL (appropriate changes in the text will change vote to APPROVAL) | ABSTENTION (For Reasons Below) | NO RESPONSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | X | |||||
| Switzerland | X | |||||
| China | X | |||||
| Germany | X | |||||
| Denmark | X | |||||
| India | X | |||||
| Italy | X | |||||
| Japan | X | |||||
| Korea, Republic of | X | |||||
| Kazakhstan | X | |||||
| Netherlands | X | |||||
| Norway | X | |||||
| Thailand | X | |||||
| United Kingdom | X | |||||
| USA | X |
Japan
1. General
We believe that it is now too late to provide a DTD extension as an standard, especially because this is still a CD.
2. Technical
What happened to the accepted Japanese comment (see N0748).
Supply a processing model as a reference model, and make sure this is implementable on top of XML conformant processors.